R. Kelly's in the hizowz

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)
1kels.jpg

In the court house, that is. Finally. I can't believe it. He arrived at noon in the Cook County Criminal Courts Building looking confident. Jury selection begins today. Can't wait to see the side by side screen shots after the verdict is rendered. You would think he was getting ready to do a charity concert, after walking the red carpet, with all of the fans screaming his name on the side line. READ MORE... and follow the link to watch the video.

I am surprised he did not do away with the braids. Those seem to be the first thing to go-- to change up the ole image. Grab your wine glasses or koolaid...whatever your preference, let us toast: Here's to no more delays

According to the Chicago Tribune here is the 14 count indictment against R.Kelly:

Count 1: Child pornography – intercourse

Counts 2 and 3: Child pornography – sexual contact

Count 4: Child pornography – masturbation

Count 5:Child pornography – lewd fondling

Count 6: Child pornography – excretion/urination

Count 7: Child pornography – pose/exhibition

Counts 8-14: Child pornography – produces or performs

Each charge is a Class 1 felony. If found guilty, the sentence would be non-consecutive, meaning he would get the same time – 4 to 15 years – whether he is convicted of one or all the charges. The charges are also non-probationable, which means, if convicted, he will have to serve time.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Therefore, if he is found guilty of one charge he will have a minimum of 4 years with no probation. If he is found guilty of all 14 charges he is looking at a minimum of 4 x 14= 56 years. So the math puts all of that stalling into perspective.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: R. Kelly's in the hizowz.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.weneedtostop.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/graduate/managed-mt/mt-tb.cgi/860

1 Comments

Shelia said:

HA! It's about to be on.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by published on May 9, 2008 1:44 PM.

It's a 100% MATCH! was the previous entry in this blog.

Why can't pop-friendly Tiffany Evans and Keke Palmer enjoy a 'Miley Cyrus' success? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Archives